Even though curfew arrests of young people in California rose from Essays on curfew laws, in to 21, inthe JPI found that there was no corresponding decrease in youth crime rates. Where is the point in having a law that makes crime increase?
In America no religion is rejected and there are new religions popping up everywhere, this law could interfere with religious holidays and celebrations. The curfew law is just another law for juveniles to break and for law abiders to obey.
They go against what America was built for — religious, political and economic freedom for all. The curfew law is the easiest law for teens to break, on purpose or on accident. In effect, this makes the house function as a prison. You cannot judge teens based on the few bad ones. Curfews hurt the right to free speech by not allowing them to conjugate during certain hours.
Curfews are just setting teens up to be charged as juvenile delinquents. This amendment is broken by having a curfew. Crime Many cities in the state of Arizona have put a curfew on all kids.
The Justice Policy Institute looked at the effect of curfews in several California cities and concluded that the curfews — which have gained widespread popularity around the country in recent years — are more of a public relations tool than a crime-fighting tool. Cities without curfew have fewer crimes during the times curfews are put in place in other cities.
Research has shown, as Miller states, that it is in the afterschool hours when parents are still at work and kids are unsupervised that kids are more likely to get in trouble, if they are going to get in trouble at all.
How are a couple of hours of free time out of the house going to give a teen time to distress and relax? Is our cities money going to the right place? Why are we paying more money just to trap our teens in their house between certain hours? Some may include breaking curfew or getting high or drunk.
Anything that can be done during curfew can be done after and before curfew.
The government should not be allowed to bully parents and give them rules for their own kids. This would make sense but as soon kids usually start waking up, around 6, school days wins again. Teenagers in this day and age are constantly stressed and overwhelmed by school.
Youth are criminalized by such laws simply for being outside of their houses. This later causes a teen to be late for curfew, and are caught and charged as juveniles for something that was not even their fault.
This supposes no trust or respect between parents and kids, and many parents have raised their kids better than this. So by the time a teen can relax its already 6 or later.
In general, money is much better spent on real crime prevention than punishing the innocent. Not every teen is a law breaker.
The 1st amendment states the right of the people peaceably to assemble. Miller makes many more reasonable arguments than does Knight. If a curfew is put in place it should be put in place for already juvenile delinquents but not for the law abiding.
So the curfew did the exact opposite it was meant to do. However if a teenager is going to break laws what is to stop them from breaking the curfew law along with it? Many times people assume obvious correlations exist between youth behavior and social problems and remove their constitutional rights with the very minimal, or almost no evidence it is necessary.
Parents rights to parenting their kids their way is taken away by a city curfew. A stressed teen is a ticking time bomb waiting to explode. He also states that afterschool programs have been shown to be far more effective in combating crime than curfews. It may explode in many different ways such as violence, suicide or breaking curfew.
Knight assumes that all kids are inherently bad, and that the only thing they would be doing on the streets is getting into trouble. Curfews may cause some teens to return home in time for curfew but then later sneak out without their parents knowing, which is worse than staying out past curfew because if something happens the parents have no idea where their child is.
The strengths are the statistics he cites — that most juvenile crime occurs between the hours of 3 pm and 11 pm, with most occurring before 8 pm.
This law is just keeping teens away for a few hours until curfew is up and they go do drugs, drink, etc… Thus there is no point to a curfew. Then they do homework for hours.Over the past several years, concern about juvenile crime and teenager's safety has led many U.S.
cities to enact teen-curfew laws. I strongly disagree that a youth curfew is an effective way to reduce juvenile crime in a community.3/5(1).
Curfew Law There are many laws passed in today's society that have a foundation for protecting our youth. Of course, many of these laws are a target for controversy, but one these laws seems to have found itself at the top of the list.
Essays; Curfew Law in Arizona; Curfew Law in Arizona. 9 September Adolescence; Crime; Many cities in the state of Arizona have put a curfew on all kids. Kids under the age of 16 cannot be out unsupervised between 10 pm and 5 am.
The most blatant example of this is the use of curfew laws. Not every teen is a law breaker. Some teens are. Can youth curfews deter the amount of crimes committed within our societies?
Today, over cities have adopted the curfew laws (NCPA). However, only fifty-percent found them effective.
Approximately cities in the US have laws regarding curfews that forbid teens from being on the streets on curfew hours that are under 18 years of age (Favro, ). Many parents and teenagers are facing countless problems regarding curfews which has.
Teenage curfew laws should be removed because they are unjust and ineffective. Curfews do not prevent teenage crimes. For instance, an article that explains the statistics of teenage crime; it mentioned that, “The number of school days in a year is essentially equal to the number of non-school days in a year.Download